A cubic equation is a Polynomial equation of degree three. Given a general cubic equation
 |
(1) |
(the Coefficient
of
may be taken as 1 without loss of generality by dividing the entire equation through by
), first attempt to eliminate the
term by making a substitution of the form
 |
(2) |
Then
The
is eliminated by letting
, so
 |
(6) |
Then
so equation (1) becomes
 |
(10) |
 |
(11) |
 |
(12) |
Defining
then allows (12) to be written in the standard form
 |
(15) |
The simplest way to proceed is to make Vieta's Substitution
 |
(16) |
which reduces the cubic to the equation
 |
(17) |
which is easily turned into a Quadratic Equation in
by multiplying through by
to obtain
 |
(18) |
(Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965, p. 106). The result from the Quadratic Equation is
where
and
are sometimes more useful to deal with than are
and
. There are therefore six solutions for
(two corresponding to each sign for each Root of
). Plugging
back in to (17) gives three pairs of
solutions, but each pair is equal, so there are three solutions to the cubic equation.
Equation (12) may also be explicitly factored by attempting to pull out a term of the form
from the cubic
equation, leaving behind a quadratic equation which can then be factored using the Quadratic Formula. This process
is equivalent to making Vieta's substitution, but does a slightly better job of motivating Vieta's ``magic''
substitution, and also at producing the explicit formulas for the solutions. First, define the intermediate variables
(which are identical to
and
up to a constant factor). The general cubic equation (12) then becomes
 |
(22) |
Let
and
be, for the moment, arbitrary constants. An identity satisfied by Perfect Cubic
equations is that
 |
(23) |
The general cubic would therefore be directly factorable if it did not have an
term (i.e., if
). However, since
in general
, add a multiple of
--say
--to both sides of (23) to give the slightly messy
identity
 |
(24) |
which, after regrouping terms, is
![\begin{displaymath}
x^3+Cx-(B^3+BC)=(x-B)[x^2+Bx+(B^2+C)]=0.
\end{displaymath}](c4_176.gif) |
(25) |
We would now like to match the Coefficients
and
with those of equation (22), so we must have
 |
(26) |
 |
(27) |
Plugging the former into the latter then gives
 |
(28) |
Therefore, if we can find a value of
satisfying the above identity, we have factored a linear term from the cubic,
thus reducing it to a Quadratic Equation. The trial solution accomplishing this miracle turns out to be the symmetrical expression
![\begin{displaymath}
B=[R+\sqrt{Q^3+R^2}\,]^{1/3}+[R-\sqrt{Q^3+R^2}\,]^{1/3}.
\end{displaymath}](c4_181.gif) |
(29) |
Taking the second and third Powers of
gives
Plugging
and
into the left side of (28) gives
 |
(32) |
so we have indeed found the factor
of (22), and we need now only factor the quadratic part. Plugging
into the quadratic part of (25) and solving the resulting
 |
(33) |
then gives the solutions
These can be simplified by defining
so that the solutions to the quadratic part can be written
 |
(37) |
Defining
where
is the Discriminant (which is defined slightly differently, including
the opposite Sign, by Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965) then gives very simple expressions for
and
, namely
Therefore, at last, the Roots of the original equation in
are then given by
with
the Coefficient of
in the original equation, and
and
as defined above. These three equations
giving the three Roots of the cubic equation are sometimes known as Cardano's Formula. Note that if the equation
is in the standard form of Vieta
 |
(46) |
in the variable
, then
,
, and
, and the intermediate variables have the simple form
(c.f. Beyer 1987)
The equation for
in Cardano's Formula does not have an
appearing in it explicitly while
and
do,
but this does not say anything about the number of Real and Complex Roots
(since
and
are themselves, in general, Complex). However, determining which
Roots are Real and which are Complex can be accomplished by
noting that if the Discriminant
, one Root is Real
and two are Complex Conjugates; if
, all Roots are Real and at least two are equal; and if
, all Roots are Real and unequal. If
, define
 |
(50) |
Then the Real solutions are of the form
This procedure can be generalized to find the Real Roots for any equation in the standard form
(46) by using the identity
 |
(54) |
(Dickson 1914) and setting
 |
(55) |
(Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965, pp. 90-91), then
 |
(56) |
 |
(57) |
 |
(58) |
If
, then use
 |
(59) |
to obtain
 |
(60) |
If
and
, use
 |
(61) |
and if
and
, use
 |
(62) |
to obtain
![\begin{displaymath}
y=\cases{
\cosh({\textstyle{1\over 3}}\cosh^{-1} C) & for $...
...{-1} C) \hbox{\ [three solutions]} & for
$\vert C\vert<1$.\cr}
\end{displaymath}](c4_259.gif) |
(63) |
The solutions to the original equation are then
 |
(64) |
An alternate approach to solving the cubic equation is to use Lagrange Resolvents.
Let
, define
where
are the Roots of
 |
(68) |
and consider the equation
![\begin{displaymath}[x-(u_1+u_2)][x-(\omega u_1+\omega^2u_2)][x-(\omega^2u_1+\omega u_2)]=0,
\end{displaymath}](c4_270.gif) |
(69) |
where
and
are Complex Numbers. The
Roots are then
 |
(70) |
for
, 1, 2. Multiplying through gives
 |
(71) |
or
 |
(72) |
where
The solutions satisfy Newton's Identities
In standard form,
,
, and
, so we have the identities
Some curious identities involving the roots of a cubic equation due to Ramanujan
are given by Berndt (1994).
See also Quadratic Equation, Quartic Equation, Quintic Equation, Sextic Equation
References
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, C. A. (Eds.).
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th printing.
New York: Dover, p. 17, 1972.
Berger, M. §16.4.1-16.4.11.1 in Geometry I. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
Berndt, B. C. Ramanujan's Notebooks, Part IV. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 22-23, 1994.
Beyer, W. H. CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 28th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 9-11, 1987.
Birkhoff, G. and Mac Lane, S. A Survey of Modern Algebra, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, pp. 90-91,
106-107, and 414-417, 1965.
Dickson, L. E. ``A New Solution of the Cubic Equation.'' Amer. Math. Monthly 5, 38-39, 1898.
Dickson, L. E. Elementary Theory of Equations. New York: Wiley, pp. 36-37, 1914.
Dunham, W. ``Cardano and the Solution of the Cubic.'' Ch. 6 in
Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics.
New York: Wiley, pp. 133-154, 1990.
Ehrlich, G. §4.16 in Fundamental Concepts of Abstract Algebra. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent, 1991.
Jones, J. ``Omar Khayyám and a Geometric Solution of the Cubic.''
http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt669/Student.Folders/Jones.June/omar/omarpaper.html.
Kennedy, E. C. ``A Note on the Roots of a Cubic.'' Amer. Math. Monthly 40, 411-412, 1933.
King, R. B. Beyond the Quartic Equation. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1996.
Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; and Vetterling, W. T. ``Quadratic and Cubic Equations.'' §5.6 in
Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 178-180, 1992.
Spanier, J. and Oldham, K. B. ``The Cubic Function
and Higher Polynomials.''
Ch. 17 in An Atlas of Functions. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 131-147, 1987.
van der Waerden, B. L. §64 in Algebra. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1970.
© 1996-9 Eric W. Weisstein
1999-05-25